1 Followers
26 Following
spafabrinde

spafabrinde

Raaginii Jaain has been campaigning for cleanliness

 

Though Ms Jaain’s depot is huge and one can see women in the campus segregating the wastage into wet and dry, one can’t feel the bad odour associated with wastage.

 

Raaginii Jaain has been campaigning for cleanliness drive from long before the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan was launched. All collections are done by waste pickers and sweepers.” Ms Jaain and her company functions on the m,oney that they earn from selling compost to both companies and individuals. This workforce is trained to collect and recycle the plastic and green waste by itself. She added that if she could not control the bad odour, residents from this posh area would not allow her to conduct this business. Laxmi, a 70-year-old woman at Ms Jaain’s depot said, “I was a beggar, Ms Jaain China Spandex Fabric manufacturers picked me and offered a job with her. According to Ms Jaain, after moving to Mumbai in 2003, she saw solid waste and nullah full of plastic waste in plush area of JVPD, and approached ‘K’ ward officer of BMC in 2003 and asked for permission to collect waste. Working on no profit-no loss, Ms Jaain’s Geetanjali Envirotech has given employment to more than 150 to 200 former beggars who are earning at least Rs 15,000 per month. “You may understand the power of contractor lobby,” she said.

Ms Jaain had started plastic waste collection, segregation and recycling in the plush area of Juhu Vile-Parle Development (JVPD) in 2003. Originally from Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh, Ms Jaain (57) later shifted to Bengaluru and then Mumbai during the course of her career. It’s the first Private-Public Partnership model in India in waste management supported by K-West Ward of MCGM. Now I earn Rs 15,000 per month.“Initially, nobody was ready to allow me as collecting waste and dump it at specific allotted area is the work allotted to some contractors and the contractors was not ready to allow me to interfere in their ‘business’” said Ms Jaain.

“But there are a few good ward officers and additional commissioners who help me and allotted a land in JVPD at the corner of Road 7,” she said.Ms Jaain specialises in training labourers, waste pickers, beggars and jobless transgenders for the job of collection and waste recycling.At the JVPD depot, the green waste is converted into organic manure in specially designed bio-bins and bio-degradable waste is converted into eco-friendly organic compost. Ms Jaain said she had developed her own special chemical, after research and development, in order to control the odour

 

Tesla wrote.It was not clear when the letter was posted

 

“The material composition of the product consists of insulated wire, connectors, terminals, tape, and conduit,” Kyungshin-Lear said in its request. The Envision accounted for nearly 15 percent of US Buick sales last year.Vice President Mike Pence said on Friday that the manner in which tariffs were removed would be part of that mechanism, aimed at ensuring China lives up to its obligations in any agreement.Those industries include new energy and autonomous vehicles, aerospace, semiconductors, biopharmaceuticals, robotics and artificial intelligence.In a previously unreported request, Tesla also asked USTR to waive tariffs on the 17-inch (43-cm) cockpit touchscreen control panel that displays navigation, media, audio, climate control, energy display, and all in-cabin controls.Made in China 2025, a program aimed at growing China’s prowess in 10 strategic industries dominated by the United States, is at the heart of trade negotiations and US demands for sweeping changes to China’s policies.Some less high-tech products cited in the 2025 denials included a wiring harness for a rear door imported by Lear Corp’s Chinese joint venture, Kyungshin-Lear Sales and Engineering LLC.Tesla said in a securities filing on Monday: “Our costs for producing our vehicles in the US have also been affected by import duties on certain components sourced from China.”

The denials illustrate a systematic approach by the Trump administration to thwart China’s efforts to develop high-technology industries that Washington alleges benefited from theft and forced transfer of US intellectual property..“For a product as safety critical to consumers, and critical to the essence of Tesla, we turned to industry experts who could achieve this quality and complexity in addition to the deadlines, which was not possible outside of China,” Tesla wrote.It was not clear when the letter was posted on a US government website.0 Autopilot electronic control unit in July 2018, which it called the “brain of the vehicle” when the Palo Alto, California-based automaker warned that “increased tariffs on this particular part cause economic harm to Tesla, through the increase of costs and impact to profitability.

“When it comes to identifying a supplier, we cannot risk our customers’ lives due to a defect from a supplier.US trade officials rejected Tesla Inc’s bid for relief from President Donald Trump’s 25-percent tariffs on the Chinese-made Autopilot “brain” of its Model 3 and other electric vehicles, one of more than 1,000 product denials linked to China’s industrial development plans.” USTR issued a separate letter also denying a request for the earlier 2.Tesla told USTR it was unable to find a manufacturer in the United States, adding that “choosing any other supplier would have delayed the (Model 3) program by 18 months with clean room setup, line validation, and staff training.Other automakers have sought similar exemptions but have not yet received answers. Kawasaki said there are no industrial robots manufactured in the United States, and it only produces robots in China and Japan.Other exclusion requests also cited the lack of US sources.GM has also sought exclusions for dozen of parts, including push button ignition switches and transmission bearings.Even if the United States and China reach a trade deal in the coming weeks to resolve their disputes, companies may not see tariff relief for months or possibly years.Tesla first made its request to exclude its 3.

Other exclusion denials were posted at the same time, including for industrial robots imported by Kawasaki Robotics USA and composite panels made by Hexcel Corp in China for use in various Boeing Co aircraft.Tesla declined to comment.Tesla has a separate pending tariff exclusion request filed in December for duties on the Chinese-made Model 3 Center Screen.The company has separate pending tariff exclusion requests for duties on the Chinese-made Model 3 Center Screen and for the Model 3 Car Computer before USTR.”Tesla says it reflashes the Autopilot ECU with the latest Firmware created in California when it is shipped from China by supplier Quanta Shanghai.”The Autopilot ECU, also used in the Model S and X, includes two printed circuit board assemblies, which Tesla calls “the brain responsible for Tesla’s Autopilot functionality” and the main safety system for the vehicle. Of the denials, 1,166, or more than a fifth, contained the same language as the Tesla request, citing links to Made in China 2025.USTR has received China tariff exclusion requests for nearly 13,000 products and denied 5,311.Nissan Motor Co and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV have also filed exclusion requests for parts, while Uber Technologies Inc asked for an exclusion for electric bikes rented through the Uber app.According to documents filed by the US Trade Representative’s office (USTR) and reviewed by Reuters, exclusion requests from Tesla and others for Chinese-made products from aircraft parts to biotechnology instruments were denied because they were deemed “strategically important” to the “Made in China 2025” program. People familiar with Nylon Spandex Fabrics suppliers the talks say that some tariffs, especially those aimed at the Made in China 2025 industries, could remain in place as part of an enforcement mechanism.”In a March 15 letter, USTR general counsel Stephen Vaughn said the agency was denying Tesla’s request because it “concerns a product strategically important or related to ‘Made in China 2025 or other Chinese industrial programs.5 version of the Autopilot ECU.General Motors Co in late July sought an exemption to a 25-percent US tariff on its Chinese-made Buick Envision sport utility vehicle

 

China is seen as seeking to displace the US in the Indo

 

Principled realism to promote a “balance of power that favours the US, our allies and our partners” is advocated.The world, of course, has changed considerably, and the current NSS deals with it. In other words, an interplay between the generals who hold several key positions in the Trump administration and the US President’s own instincts.Second is the formal US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, pending the final resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute. China gets more attention, the tone being set by the opening assertion that many nations have risen as “they subsidised their industries, forced technology transfers and distorted markets”. The NSS loftily claims that today “geopolitical competition is between free and repressive visions of the world order”.. In the Security Council, the resolution was vetoed by Washington when even allies and permanent members Britain and France joined a 14-1 landslide. Former Indian President K. To do this, the US will counter unfavourable shifts in “the Indo-Pacific, Europe and Middle East”.

More global turbulence can safely be predicted for 2018. The former, it is felt, is attempting to restore great power status by establishing spheres of influence near its borders. Friends and rivals can switch with the context.Two major events are already casting a shadow over US policymaking.

 

Finally, while both are aspiring to project power worldwide, they are seen as principal actors in their neighbourhoods, upsetting existing balances of power. With Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu arriving in India next month it is a brave but necessary move, although it may go in Mr Trump’s debit account. In fact, similar anti-UN rhetoric was prevalent during the Ronald Reagan presidency in the 1980s too and even speculation that perhaps the UN headquarters needed to move to a less hostile environment. Noticeably, it resurrects great power rivalry by identifying Russia and China, besides states like Iran and North Korea and non-state terrorist entities, as the prime challenges.R.It is proposed for the US to respond to political, economic and military competition globally. This has embarrassed America’s partners and allies in the Islamic world and emboldened others to resist, including Nato ally Turkey. China is seen as seeking to displace the US in the Indo-Pacific and expand the reach of its state-driven economic model.India finds mention in both the South and Central Asian context as well as the Indo-Pacific construct. The end of the Cold War in 1989-90 diffused polarisation among the permanent members of the Security Council, and American unilateralism became the means to address international crises, with rubber-stamping by the UN. Thus, the US will try bridging a paradox. But this Trumpian nativism is at variance with US exceptionalism which had created and defended the “free” order in the last century. The reference is to Russian actions in Ukraine, Crimea and Central Asia. Seen leading the revisionist challenge are Russia and China. The past assumption that by engaging rivals and including them in international institutions and global commerce would make them benign players and partners has turned out to be false. That US power can be self-sustaining, it argues, is a false belief.The NSS opens with a Nylon Spandex Fabrics suppliers “America First Foreign Policy” incantation and in a Trumpian flourish promises a “new and very different course”.

 

A warning from the United States that those voting against it would invite America’s wrath and denial of aid actually worked to irritate nations like Canada, which was planning to oppose but abstained in order not to be seen as US lackeys. One was the WTO ministerial conference in Argentina where India, seeking exception for the procurement of crops for food security, was strongly opposed by the US. India’s vote with the majority in the General Assembly is a sensible course correction from the unbridled pro-US tilt. There are the usual threats and cajolements to Pakistan on curbing the terror syndicates operating from its territory. In the General Assembly on Thursday, 128 nations voted for the resolution, eight opposed it and the rest abstained.While previous American administrations have espoused much of the same views, there is a certain change in tone and a brutal frankness in US President Donald Trump’s new National Security Strategy (NSS), unveiled in mid-December, that reflects Mr Trump’s personality and style. Significantly, four permanent members of the UNSC voted with the majority, as did India. Narayanan, when he was ambassador to the US in the early 1980s, was fond of telling his US audiences that great powers and small minds go ill together. Free enterprise is touted as “history’s greatest antidote to poverty”. But it will be useful to remember that any nation is just one tweet away from being a friend or a pariah. It applies so appositely to many nationalistic leaders of big and emerging powers today. Multilateralism, in line with Mr Trump’s nativist beliefs, finds no mention.

 

On the other, it will aggressively market its arms and products abroad by twisting arms, prying open what it considers as non-level playing rules, asking allies and partners to share the security burden, and so on. One the one hand, it will ring-fence its technologies against poaching, restrict immigration of non-gifted persons, closely scrutinise students from designated nations pursuing higher education in advanced disciplines of science and technology, closely assess foreign investments through its Committee on Foreign Investment in the US and scuttle the role of international institutions like the WTO. Syria, where Russia has successfully resurrected its ally, the Bashar al- Assad regime, is not mentioned, and is hardly near Russia’s borders. Consequently, resolutions were moved in the UN Security Council and General Assembly to condemn the US and seek a reversal of its policy. Further, the European Union and Japan joined the US to focus on industrial overcapacity and forced technology transfers, thus directly targeting China. Van Jackson, writing for an Australian think tank, says it represents a “continuously renegotiated bargain between neo-conservative hawks and America First nativists”